I recorded this podcast episode a year ago. It was removed from YouTube within… maybe two minutes after it was uploaded?
I was propelled to share this with you for several reasons. I’ll get to them after I embed the episode, as it is still available on Spotify, or at this link here. It’s Episode 12 so you’ll have to scroll down a bit if you go to the RSS feed at the link.
If you want to know the really cute “re-education” process YouTube asks you to go through in order to get your account back and out of indefinite restriction status (or removal and if you go too far, a device ban, different topic), scroll to the bottom. I took pictures of the questions on the “Test” they make you take.. just to let you know that if you want to speak, sing, or reach other humans, since for some reason we’re all congregating in these virtual hives now, you’ll have to prove you’ve been redeemed of your “Wrong Think” status.
The irony of all that being from an episode titled wrong think is not beyond me.
You can enjoy that podcast and stop reading, you can check out the second podcast I linked on CBDCs and Digital IDs and Gov’t Euthanasia below, you can peep YouTube’s re-education camp at the very bottom, or you can continue reading and weigh in on a conversation between myself and my friend who builds artificial intelligence & algorithms.
This is a choose your own adventure post.
I was reading an article on
about censorship on Twitter, and it brought up something I still have not found a way around and have more anger toward than I care to express — censorship.A few weeks ago, I was speaking with a friend of mine who founded an Artificial Intelligence company and builds algorithms.
I’ve known him for 20 years. He’s playing with fire, but might wind up being one of humanities greatest allies. He is aware of my frustrations with being thrown into the digital gulag for calling out nefarious agendas, speaking out against the Jim Jones Juice (covid injection) and other things over the years.
I said this to him:
“Freedom of speech is now freedom of REACH.”
Which really tripped me out, because when I was reading
‘s article tonight, I saw this image that Demi had screen shotted a few months back, from the Twitter CEO literally admitting it:My algorithm building friend asked me to share the discussion we had, maybe you will have ideas, thoughts, shared experiences? This affects everyone, being that we have to be able to communicate with each other, and unless we can convince everyone to get these babylonian rectangles of death (iphones) out of our lives… we gotta figure out something.
His response:
“I’ve been thinking a lot about what you said: “Freedom of speech is freedom of reach.” It’s a compelling and multi-layered statement that really got me reflecting on the nature and limits of free speech, especially in our modern context.
In the U.S., our First Amendment rights guarantee freedom of speech, a cornerstone of our democratic values. But this right is primarily a protection against government censorship and doesn’t necessarily extend to private platforms or social settings. Here, various factors like social norms and corporate policies play a significant role.
The idea of “freedom of reach” suggests that true freedom of speech isn’t just about the ability to speak, but also about the ability to be heard. In today’s digital age, where social media platforms are central to information dissemination, the algorithms that control what gets seen and what doesn’t can significantly influence the reach of our speech. When a platform limits the visibility of certain viewpoints, especially those challenging the mainstream. it can impact our practical exercise of free speech.
It’s also important to consider that these platforms and communities often have policies to regulate speech to prevent harm, like hate speech or misinformation. Balancing free discourse with protecting community standards is a complex and often controversial task.
Your point about being “verbally stunted” by AI and societal attitudes is particularly intriguing. It reflects the concern about how technology and social pressures can subtly, yet powerfully, shape public discourse. AI can filter or flag content, potentially restricting the spread of certain ideas. Similarly, societal norms can create an environment where voicing certain viewpoints might lead to social repercussions, effectively discouraging people from expressing controversial or dissenting opinions.
In essence, while our legal framework supports free speech, the practical reality of expressing and disseminating that speech in our modern world is influenced by a host of factors. This makes the concept of “freedom of speech” far more intricate in practice than in theory.
I’m curious to hear more of your thoughts on this.”
-My algorithm building friend that I’ve known since high school.
SOOOO… I dislike labels and boxes, but if you had to ball-park me:
I am an anti-state spiritual anarchist that wants to see the human spirit fully unleashed, and I want to watch all falsehoods and tyrants fucking burn.
I fuck with anarchy, but real anarchy — not stupid shit that people think anarchy is. More on this in another post. I’ll let good ‘ole Jack Spirko speak on it, he just released a podcast the other day explaining what it is and isn’t on The Survival Podcast.
I fuck with voluntaryism, agorism, the exit and build movement, parallel societies and economies, just fucking walk away and build something different. If it comes to war then so be it, but as I have said before, the next battle I believe will be one of spiritual warfare. Technically, it already is… and likely always has been. But this is where I believe the final stand will be made.
I say this because my algorithm building friend is NOT on the “fuck the state lets all get land start a homestead and these motherfuckers need their heads on pikes” type of person, not yet at least. That is one of the reasons why this conversation was so important, because we are not “aligned” when it comes to let’s say.. i mean I’m anti-politics as fuck but “political leanings”?
However, we always meet each other with open and respectful dialogue, which I think is important. I think that’s the way forward for all of us, to hear the other one out without having this knee-jerk reaction of “fuck you, you’re wrong, die.” Or whatever the kids say these days.
My response:
“Yeah I have a lot of thoughts on that. There’s a difference between hate speech and speech somebody hates. There’s a double standard to all of it and the hive mind is beyond neurotic. I won’t even go on the internet right now, but from the tiny bit I see, we have human beings applauding the death of babies from one country as long as it isn’t from the other, and somehow this has become okay.
So clearly moderation of speech has absolutely nothing to do with preserving the integrity of humanity, because that’s the content that is always at the top of every fucking algorithm. This is the killing of the mind. Designed, of course, as something for our safety.
But about the dissenting thing, I experienced that on a very extreme level in 2021 as did most of the planet who shared my experience. All of us had our own family members and people we grew up with, including also strangers, wish death upon us for going against or even merely questioning the covid narrative, the vaccine narrative, and even for not wanting to take the vaccine and pointing out how reckless the whole operation was. For pointing out how nothing was adding up.
Now proven to be fact, but back then was conspiracy, and we had people wishing death on us on a regular basis, calling us plague rats and applauding our housing and job loss among other things. And that was allowed. But our questions were not.
This is something I wish more people would pay attention to. But we are fed information at such a rapid rate that nobody can pay attention anymore and that is by design.”
-Me, responding to my Algorithm Building Friend. IDK if he wants to be named so that’s the name he’s getting for now haha.
Speaking of people being overwhelmed by information, the struggle is real and I have more to say on all of this, so let’s make this a series, instead of me shoving it all down your eye holes at once.
I’ll end with..
This is why I don’t fuck with political systems or any form of public monitoring or anything —- and this is why I advocate a spiritual revolution:
NO “SYSTEM” OUT THERE IS GOING TO WORK WITH THE COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS AT THE LEVEL IT’S AT. IT WILL BE CORRUPTED EVERY SINGLE TIME.
The same can be said for the Anarchist model, or the Exit and Build model, I’m well aware of this. All of these things are ideal in theory, but practice is an entirely different ballgame, as my friend was mentioning in his reflections on free speech. And I have seen this firsthand in my participation in these communities.
I’d still take that any day over whatever this dystopian fuckshit is, but even people in the “freedom cells” or Agorist communities are WELL AWARE that we need to learn how to come together on a mental/emotional/spiritual level, or nothing will get done.
Also, fuck the banks. More on CBDCs and social credit scores later I suppose. Or you can listen to this podcast episode I did (also a year ago) which likely touched on all that and then some, in my then typical unmanaged hyperactive brains fashion:
(Episode 11: Death Panels, CBDCs, Digital IDs, Gov’t Euthanasia & More)
As Derek Broze once put it, “Revolution without healing is a recipe for disaster”. He is correct about that.
Nothing is “for your safety”, it’s for whoever the fuck is holding the strings’ security and control, THAT’S IT.
Life itself isn’t safe, why are we trying to make it like that? What the hell are we doing?
This is where SOVEREIGNTY comes into play. This is where we can back the fuck off and let NATURE RUN ITS COURSE. Hey, you don’t like what people say on the internet?
Cool, don’t go there.
You don’t like other people thinking differently than you? Uhhhhmmmmm there are 8 billion of us on this planet allegedly, so…are you new?
Hey, did that person do something to genuinely cause you harm? I suppose you’d better handle that.
No one is coming to save anyone, and beware anyone who claims they are. Those agencies for your protection are more dangerous than your enemies. Those are your true enemies, the ones that are out to harvest and snuff out your soul behind the guise of:
S A F E T Y,
and all those cute buzzwords now like equity and fairness and inclusivity and yooooo shut the fuck up reptile.
I shall retire to meditate and sleep, as I could certainly use both.
Here’s some cute pics of what happens when you get accused of medical misinformation and have your content yeeted from YouTube for literally airing news clips (that you got from youtube lol) and also sharing a real life experience in a child abuse pharma cult that is also certifiably fucking verified, but getting accused of “medical misinformation” — the worst kind of misinformation, truly, because you’re fucking with one of the largest rackets and money grabs on the planet.
Which is why they need to make sure no one can hear you, cuz they know they can’t make you shut up.
Not yet at least.
I will elaborate more on where I’m going with all of this in future articles, but I think two podcasts episodes, a conversation and some pictures are enough for one thing.
This one is a bit odd… never talked about abortions in the episode… here they are going to bat for two drugs I’ve never even heard of:
Hey guys, turns out if a drug gives you adverse reactions like oh i dont know a drug designed to fuck with your fertility making you infertile, you’re not allowed to share that experience! better shut up and trust the health authorities, it must all be in your head. Plus, this is a woman in the example, I bet she’s just suffering from anxiety! (I hope you hear the sarcasm in my digital words)
They’re literally telling you what is true by telling you what to think isn’t true, cuz I sure as shit didn’t ask. Although I was already aware. Thanks For The Reminder, as one may say…
I think you get it. If you doubt any of this shit is happening, I am certainly not about to post all 50+ of these photos, but you can go to my instagram right here and look at the highlight bubble on my page that says “CENSORSHIP” if you need more receipts from over the years.
And I am only ONE person… and I’m certainly not some giant content creator or public figure. If they have gone as hard as they have on me (going hard on me is not removing a youtube video btw, it’s everything they’ve been doing for years, plus some other shit that will be saved for another stack) yo…how hard do you think they’ll go on YOU?
Connection is key. Love and light. Tra la la. XO
a good definition of "freedom of speech" is,
"when two people who want to speak to each other can speak to each other without interference"
of course,
my favorite is "IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT SPEECH YOU DISAGREE WITH, YOU DON'T SUPPORT FREE SPEECH"
but to address your "free speech=free reach"
i think the key point here is that everyone should be subject to the exact same rules
and those rules should be transparent
I don’t know what to say, but I think I am with you 100%.